Interest Rates and Currency-Price Volatility

The interest rates associated with individual currencies are one of the most obvious yet least-understood forces in the foreign exchange marketplace. Their most negative effects capture public attention during carry-trade bubbles, such as the recent (summer 2007) rise—and then abrupt fall—of the New Zealand dollar versus the Japanese yen. But day-to-day, currency traders are misled by a broken market mechanism that encourages pricing to skew away from any connection with reality.
In the following interview, Richard Olsen, co-founder of OANDA, discusses this little-understood issue. The solution he recommends—and has put into practice at Olsen and OANDA, the prominent online forex brokerage he founded in 1995—is continuous interest-rate payment, second-by-second, on all open positions.
Continuous interest makes the yield component of every currency transaction real. In a marketplace where fundamentals are few and far between, and where pricing tends to lack any fundamental frame of reference, continuous interest will help stabilize markets and enable incremental intervention to avoid valuation free-falls…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

March 11th, 2009 | Economics, News | 2 Comments »

Call for global early warning system and dynamic central bank intervention to stabilize markets

Enclosed are the slides of a talk that I gave in context of the launch of the Asia-Pacific operation of OANDA Corp. I hope that you will find the content of the slides interesting. The talk explains, why tick by tick screening of market prices is so important for a successful analysis of market trends. It gives recommendations of how retail and institutional investors and corporations should respond to the current crisis. The foreign exchange markets offer significant return opportunities. For corporations and other institutions with currency exposure, the implementation of currency overlays are essential. I then outline, how the governments and central banks can be pro-active to overcome the current crisis. I suggest that they should launch a global early warning system for financial markets and the economy at large, start a program of dynamic foreign exchange interventions to stabilize volatility and finally launch an effort to digitalize the financial markets to get rid of the outdated business practices. You are invited to comment and ask questions…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

February 25th, 2009 | Economics, News | No Comments »

How science can prevent the next bubble

Since the world became aware in the summer of 2007 of an imminent financial crisis, people have asked why so few experts saw it coming. There have been many calls for an early warning system for the world economy – but little has been said about how to build one.
To construct a global early warning system we have to overcome the predicament Alan Greenspan, the former US Federal Reserve chairman, highlighted 12 years ago. “How do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values?” he asked. “We should not underestimate … the complexity of the interactions of asset markets and the economy.”
Macroeconomic data alone cannot provide sufficient information to determine whether asset prices are inflated. We need to dig deeper and track the complexity of interactions in financial markets and the economy…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

February 18th, 2009 | General, News | 1 Comment »

Market outlook for 2009

2008 was a watershed for the financial markets: equity markets experienced a massive sell off and credit markets stopped functioning with bank lending coming to a standstill. Central banks had to intervene on an unprecedented scale.
Will the government and central bank interventions reverse the tide? Based on our analysis worse is to come: our biggest fear is that one of the governments of the G6 will default on its debts and that confidence in the financial system will plummet.
Olsen measures tick by tick market volatility: today, the short-term market volatility in currency markets is approximately 10 times higher than in previous years. This indicates that liquidity has declined by roughly 80 percent. At the same time, global capital flows have continued at the original pace or worse are actually increasing, because companies and investors have to rebalance their international exposure. In previous years, it was safe to assume that currency moves would be contained within a range of plus minus 20 percent. Based on our quantitative analysis, we expect price moves of 50% and more for G6 currencies in 2009. We expect that AUD, CAD, CHF and JPY will be beneficiaries and USD, GBP and EUR will be the losers…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

January 20th, 2009 | Market, News | No Comments »

Strategy to reduce short-term volatility to prevent large scale price shocks in foreign exchange

The credit and equity markets have been rocked by exceptional events. The currency markets have seemingly been spared of a lot of grief, even though there have been large scale price moves of 20 and 30 percent, but not as detrimental as the events in the other markets. We argue that it is only a matter of time until similarly catastrophic events occur in the currency markets. We argue that central banks have to take a pro-active role in the foreign exchange markets to dampen volatility and prevent big price shocks in the currency market. We are not arguing for large scale interventions, but for an ongoing quantitative intervention strategy to provide market liquidity in the spot currency markets, whenever there is a short-term imbalance of demand and supply. Imbalances of demand and supply have an amplified impact: price spikes trigger margin calls, which lead to a cascade of margin calls setting in train massive price dislocations…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

December 16th, 2008 | Economics, News | No Comments »

Call for a global early warning system

With the deepening economic crisis there have been repeated calls for an early warning system of the world economy. Little has been said, how such a system should be built.

To build a global early warning system we have to overcome the predicament that Alan Greenspan highlighted: ‘How do we know when international exuberance has unduly escalated asset values?….We should not underestimate or become complacent about the complexity of the interactions of asset markets and the economy…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

December 16th, 2008 | General, News | No Comments »

Investing in Currency

Investing in a portfolio of currencies is different from currency trading. The success of currency trading comes, obviously, from being on the right side—either long or short—of one transaction. In a certain sense this is like successful stock-picking: you commit to one position; you hope that the equity you choose will, sooner or later, be valued at a higher rate when you decide to sell it; you expect that if you time your sale correctly other investors will be willing to buy the security, even at its appreciated price.

Currency investing is different. Compared to investing in stocks or bonds, its time horizons are greatly compressed (meaning that the effects of trading volume plus liquidity plus the perceived value of a currency can present greater opportunities for gain and loss in one day that you might expect on conventional equity and fixed income markets in one year).

The equality of gains and losses: conventional investing is based on the notion of one-sided ownership: you buy (go long)…you hold…you sell. Currency markets, in contrast, place equal value on selling (going short); this is reflected in the very nature of every currency transaction because you must buy and sell a pair: you cannot take a one-sided position. As a practical matter, this means that opportunities exist regardless of whether “the market” is rising, falling, or moving sideways…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

December 16th, 2008 | Investment, News | No Comments »

A New Framework for Risk and Return In Liquid Markets

Action, reaction, and the echoes of uncertainty:
the R&D we should be doing, and how that will contribute
to true efficiency in the marketplace

Richard Olsen challenges three received notions that mire the global economy in counter-productive habits that destroy value: that market prices in gross time tell us everything we need to know; that such information as we have is a trustworthy indicator of things to come; and that the chain of events in price evolution is orderly and self-correcting.

Olsen Ltd. has discovered and validated 17 new power laws that prove this firm’s long-held belief: much of the market’s volatility is invisible to casual, low-resolution analysis. While much work remains to be done, Olsen is taking steps to encourage the accumulation and analysis of very-high-resolution data to fuel sophisticated models that leverage the insights and power of the new scaling laws. With two strategic objectives: to increase return as a product of the predictive capacity of better trading models, and to counter the effect of inevitably irrational behavior by providing liquidity in the face of skewed pricing patterns…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version of the illustration.

December 16th, 2008 | High frequency finance, News | No Comments »

Trading the currency markets: Is gut feeling still state-of-the-art?

The first shall be last, and the last first.
In the 1990s every large bank that wanted to be taken seriously placed a huge bet on their trading engines. But it was a long shot: they hired rocket scientists with the mandate to develop trading models based on neural networks, genetics algorithms and other magical tools that had paid off in the more respected disciplines of hard science…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

December 16th, 2008 | Investment, News | 1 Comment »

The fallacy of the Invisible Hand

Since the inception of classical economics over 200 years ago, one of the most sacred assumptions has been the hypothesis that an invisible hand determines market prices and that market prices follow a random walk. Today, there exists significant statistical evidence that this is not the case and we need to acknowledge that financial markets are, indeed, predictable. How is this possible?…

Clicking here will retrieve an Acrobat version.

December 15th, 2008 | Economics, News | No Comments »